| Overall Grade: | C+ |
|---|---|
| Violence: | C+ |
| Sexual Content: | C |
| Language: | C- |
| Drugs/Alcohol: | A |
| Run Time: | 125 |
| MPAA Rating: | |
| Video Release: |
In-Depth Review
Big Fish is rated PG-13: for fight scenes, some images of nudity and a suggestive reference
Being a big fisheven in a small pondtakes a great deal of effort. For Edward Bloom (Ewan McGregor/Albert Finney), every incident in his life has been carefully cultivated and fed until it grows into a fish story worthy of hooking any audiences attention.
But for one listener, those tall tales are just too much. After years of hearing about the big fish that swallowed his wedding ring, along with other epics involving a giant, a circus ringleader, and Chinese conjoined twin singers, Edwards son William (Billy Crudup) simply couldnt bear hearing one more yarnespecially at his wedding reception. Leaving the room that night, the boy also walks away from his parents life.
Years later William gets a call from his mother (Jessica Lange) informing him of his fathers failing health. Returning home with his wife (Marion Cotillard), the estranged son again finds himself at the mercy of his Dads nostalgic narrative. Recognizing this is his last opportunity to try and understand this man, William begs for some straight answers. His fathers response is that hes always told him the truth.
Still not satisfied, William heads to the small Alabama town where much of his dads life took place. There he finds a prominent character from his fathers stories, and learns much about the real Edward Blooms achievements and failures.
Director Tim Burton, known for his oft times bizarre imagination, manages to create a unique film that can best be described as Death of a Salesman with a generous sprinkling of Burtonesque seasoning.
Whether coincidentally or by design, the movie does a good job of paralleling the viewers experience with the sons perspective. For the first half of the film, watching dramatizations of the fathers stories becomes a tedious process that borders on pointless. Why are we listening to these countless trumped up tales? In the second half, as William attempts to sift fact from fiction, the audience is willing to try and find some answers too.
However there is still a difficult question that may sink this movies potential: What demographic is supposed to bite at this story? Certainly at times, the vivid images are somewhat childlike and reminiscent of the ghost stories likely to be told at summer camp. Yet the central theme of an adult child trying to reconcile with a parent is clearly aimed at a more mature crowd. So are the infrequent inclusions of strong profanities, rear male and female nudity, and a joke about a milkman that includes a crude sexual reference.
Despite a sincere effort by the cast and a sentimental ending, this abstract premise may leave most theatergoers feeling like this is one Big Fish that got away.
Was This Review Helpful?
If this review helped you find a great movie, or saved you time and money, please consider donating.
Discussion Ideas
Why was William embarrassed by his fathers stories, while others found them charming or humorous? Why do children see their parents differently than how others see them? Why does their perspective change as they grow older? You may find it interesting to research the lives of some of your progenitors and discover who they are.
Can you recall times when you have recounted an incident and added some extra emphasis for dramatic effect? Is embellishing a story any different than lying?
Video alternatives
For some classic stories of questionable validity put to film, look for Tall Tale starring Patrick Swayze.

Rod Gustafson has worked in various media industries since 1977. He founded Parent Previews in 1993, and today continues to write and broadcast the reviews in newspapers, on radio and (of course) on the Internet. He currently serves as the President of the Alberta Association for Media Awareness, a provincial non-profit society. He also authors a regular column for